Photographic "smoking guns" of murder of 34 US Sailors aboard the USS Liberty

[kahlmyishmael]

The USS Liberty murders are only a footnote in 20th-century US History but they're the most important footnote.
1) THE STORY STUNK TO HIGH HEAVEN FROM THE VERY BEGINNING -- translation. .. the US News Media was part of the coverup.

So why would airtime STILL AFTER 40 years be granted by THAT SAME News Media to Hanoi Jane Fonda protesters while the News Media has immunized itself from an equally evil deed?



Old News? Water under the Bridge???

2) EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES- -- for the "40-year old news" motif to carry weight NOT ONLY must the Hanoi Jane counterpoint be answered with some "standard of sufficiency" BUT ALSO the US Government, US News Media, & US Entgertainment Media MUST ANSWER ...

a)why it was ABLE TO BE covered up in the first place(pro-Zionist ownership of media outlets)

b)what MONTH/YEAR things ACTUALLY CHANGED to where a horror like this(911 WTC) could NEVER, EVER be repeated and covered up?

...so...what MONTH/YEAR did things actually change in the US Government and US News Media to where it was ADMITTED THAT the US Government was involved in the murder of 34 US Sailors and...
...that the US News Media helped to cover it up AS EVIDENCED BY the arrest and trial of the perpetrators?


That did not happen, did it?


So we have the same problem today as we did 40 years ago...and therefore 20 years ago... and therefore 20 minutes ago..

..so the "40-year old news" motif fails.


Also...the US Government as LATE AS 1/12/2004 and 5/15/2006 is still telling lies about the USS Liberty murders... so again, the "old news", "water under the bridge" motif fails



DOCTORED PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE #1..... PROVIDED BY Government of Israel to Thames Televison/ Cristol p.79 of "The Liberty Incident"

a) these PHOTOS were taken moments apart... The USS Liberty was attacked in the Easern Med... not in Norfolk, Virginia

b) there should BE NO boat showing since these are PURPORTEDLY Gun Camera photos from the attacking Mirage Fighters AND THE attack aircraft had departed BEFORE THE motor torpedo boats arrived

c)notice the "tension cable" extending from the tugboat wheelhouse TO THE fantail in BOTH photos... the USS Liberty was NOT attacked by toot-toot little tugboats assembled in battle formation.


d)look at the single INDIVIDUAL at the bow(front) in BOTH PHOTOS separated from a GROUP OF PEOPLE at the bow.... remember...these people are standing leisurely while a strafing run of 30mm cannon fire is being directed at the ship...


e)the USS Liberty is riding TOO HIGH in the water for June 8, 1967... 8 feet too high.... they had been loaded down at Rota, Spain earlier in the preceeding two weeks.

f)Israel intentionally blurred this photograph.. .ALSO....

...they've attempted to make it LOOK LIKE a "photographic negative"...

it isn't though!!

---what they did was to TURN UP the "Black-and-White" CONTRAST SETTING to HIGH MAXIMUM to make it APPEAR like a "photographic negative"


"Innocent people[/governments ] don't need to doctor evidence"
http://www.ussliber ty.org/g/ photofraud. jpg (http://www.ussliberty.org/g/photofraud.jpg)
http://www.ussliberty.org/g/photofraud.jpg


DOCTORED PHOTO #2... from IDF History Report of 1982
If Rosie O'Donnell is standing IN FRONT OF a Pepsi Machine and a PHOTOGRAPHIC SNAPSHOT is taken of her...

..The Pepsi machine WILL NOT be visible since...

..Rosie O'Donnell is NOT "transparent" .

Similarly... . there should be a portion of the wheelhouse/superstructure that is obscured by THE MAST of the USS Liberty(superimpose d by a red outline)...
There is NOTHING obscured... Israel not only blurred TWO Photos...this SECOND PHOTO is not only NOT the USS Liberty ...it is NOT EVEN a Victory-Hull type ship.

http://members. aol.com/kjhalliw ell/ussliberty/ essays/essay12. html (http://members.aol.com/kjhalliwell/ussliberty/essays/essay12.html)
http://members.aol.com/kjhalliwell/ussliberty/essays/essay12_images/image001.jpg

"Innocent people[/governments ] don't need to doctor evidence"
SIDE-BY-SIDE COMPARISON of two DIFFERENT PHOTOS during the SAME attack on the SAME day of the USS Liberty.
These ARE NOT the same vessels...

... as stated EARLIER the left photo is NOT EVEN a Victory-Hull ship...and this photo ORIGINATES FROM the IDF History Report of 1982 "which styles itself as the Official Israeli Governement explanation of the fact of the USS Liberty attack"
http://members. aol.com/kjhalliw ell/ussliberty/ essays/essay7. html (http://members.aol.com/kjhalliwell/ussliberty/essays/essay7.html)

http://members.aol.com/kjhalliwell/ussliberty/essays/essay7_images/image001.jpg


"Innocent people[/governments] don't need to doctor evidence"

[kahlmyishmael]

CONCLUSIONS:
http://members. aol.com/kjhalliw ell/ussliberty/ essays/essay13. html (http://members.%20aol.com/kjhalliw%20ell/ussliberty/%20essays/essay13.%20html)




STATEMENT OF CIA DIRECTOR at time of attack:
http://www.ussliber ty.org/helmstext .htm (http://www.ussliberty.org/helmstext.htm)

I had no role in the [CIA B]oard of nquiry that followed, or the board's finding that there could be no doubt that the Israeli's knew exactly what they were doing in attacking the Liberty. I have yet to understand why it was felt necessary to attack this ship or who ordered the attack.

http://www.ussliber ty.org/ (http://www.ussliberty.org/)




<TABLE><TBODY><TR><TH><TD colSpan=55>

<TH><TD align=left></I>

";I was never satisfied with the Israeli explanation. . . . Through diplomatic channels we refused to accept their explanations. I didn't believe them then, and I don't believe them to this day. The attack was outrageous " (http://www.ussliberty.org/rusk.htm)
<CITE>-- US Secretary of State Dean Rusk</CITE>




<TH><TD colSpan=55></I>

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE><TBODY><TR><TH><TD colSpan=55></I>

<TH><TD align=left></I>

";...the board of inquiry (concluded) that the Israelis knew exactly what they were doing in attacking the [I]Liberty." (http://www.ussliberty.org/helmstext.htm)
<CITE>-- CIA Director Richard Helms</CITE>




<TH><TD colSpan=55>

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE><TBODY><TR><TH><TD colSpan=55>

<TH><TD align=left>

";I can tell you for an absolute certainty (from intercepted communications) that the Israelis knew they were attacking an American ship." (http://www.usni.org/proceedings/Articles03/PROwalsh06.htm)
<CITE>-- NSA Deputy Director Oliver Kirby</CITE>




<TH><TD colSpan=55>

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE><TBODY><TR><TH><TD colSpan=55>

<TH><TD align=left>

";That the Liberty could have been mistaken for the Egyptian supply ship El Quseir is unbelievable (http://www.ussliberty.org/cliffor2.htm)"
<CITE>-- Special Assistant to the President Clark Clifford, in his report to President Lyndon Johnson</CITE>




<TH><TD colSpan=55>

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE><TBODY><TR><TH><TD colSpan=55>

<TH><TD align=left>

";The highest officials of the [Johnson] administration, including the President, believed it 'inconceivable' that Israel's 'skilled' defense forces could have committed such a gross error." (http://tinyurl.com/c52ne)
<CITE>-- Lyndon Johnson's biographer Robert Dallek in </CITE>Flawed Giant<CITE>, Oxford University Press, 1998, pp. 430-31)</CITE>




<TH><TD colSpan=55>

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE><TBODY><TR><TH><TD colSpan=55>

<TH><TD align=left>

";A nice whitewash for a group of ignorant, stupid and inept [expletive deleted]." (http://www.ussliberty.org/tordella.htm)
<CITE>-- Handwritten note of August 26, 1967, by NSA Deputy Director Louis W. Tordella reacting to the Israeli court decision exonerating Israelis of blame for the Liberty attack.</CITE>




<TH><TD colSpan=55>

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE><TBODY><TR><TH><TD colSpan=55>

<TH><TD align=left>

"Never before in the history of the United States Navy has a Navy Board of Inquiry ignored the testimony of American military eyewitnesses and taken, on faith, the word of their attackers.
<CITE>-- Captain Richard F. Kiepfer, Medical Corps, US Navy (retired), USS Liberty Survivor</CITE>




<TH><TD colSpan=55>

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE><TBODY><TR><TH><TD colSpan=55>

<TH><TD align=left>

";The evidence was clear. Both Admiral Kidd and I believed with certainty that this attack...was a deliberate effort to sink an American ship and murder its entire crew.... It was our shared belief. . .that the attack. . .could not possibly have been an accident.... I am certain that the Israeli pilots [and] their superiors. . .were well aware that the ship was American." (http://www.ussliberty.org/bostondeclaration.pdf)
<CITE>-- Captain Ward Boston, JAGC, US Navy (retired), senior legal counsel to the US Navy Court of Inquiry</CITE>




<TH><TD colSpan=55>

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE><TBODY><TR><TH><TD colSpan=55>

<TH><TD align=left>

That the attack was deliberate "just wasn't a disputed issue" within the National Security Agency (http://www.usni.org/proceedings/Articles03/PROwalsh06-3.htm)
<CITE>-- Former NSA Director retired Army Lieutenant General William Odom (http://www.hudson.org/learn/index.cfm?fuseaction=staff_bio&eid=OdomWill) on 3 March 2003 in an interview for Naval Institute Proceedings</CITE>




<TH><TD colSpan=55>

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE><TBODY><TR><TH><TD colSpan=55>

<TH><TD align=left>

<A href="http://www.usni.org/proceedings/Articles03/PROwalsh06-3.htm" target=_blank rel=nofollow>Former NSA/CIA Director Admiral Bobby Inman "flatly rejected" the Cristol/Israeli claims that the attack was an accident
<CITE>-- 5 March 2003 interview for Naval Institute Proceedings</CITE>

(http://www.towforum.com/)


<TH><TD colSpan=55>

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE><TBODY><TR><TH><TD colSpan=55>

<TH><TD align=left>

<A href="http://www.usni.org/proceedings/Articles03/PROwalsh06.htm" target=_blank rel=nofollow>Of four former NSA/CIA seniors with inside knowledge, none was aware of any agency official who dissented from the position that the attack was deliberate
<CITE>-- David Walsh, writing in Naval Institute Proceedings</CITE>

(http://www.towforum.com/)


<TH><TD colSpan=55>

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE><TBODY><TR><TH><TD colSpan=55>

<TH><TD align=left>
; "It appears to me that it was not a pure case of mistaken identity." (http://www.ussliberty.org/supporters.htm)
<CITE>-- Captain William L. McGonagle, Commanding Officer, USS Liberty, speaking at Arlington National Cemetery, June 8, 1997</CITE>




<TH><TD colSpan=55>

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE><TBODY><TR><TH><TD colSpan=55>

<TH><TD align=left>"To suggest that they [the IDF] couldn't identify the ship is ... ridiculous. ... Anybody who could not identify the Liberty could not tell the difference between the White House and the Washington Monument."
<CITE>-- Admiral Thomas Moorer, Chief of Naval Operations and later Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, quoted in The Washington Post, June 15, 1991, p. 14<CITE>

</CITE></CITE>


</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
</I>

[kahlmyishmael]

Dead In The Water...complete video..69 minutes
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article5073.htm (http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article5073.htm)


There is a "Dead In The Water" DVD available for viewing on YouTube.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=hYonRtD3S-s (http://youtube.com/watch?v=hYonRtD3S-s)

Peter Hounam's book, "Operation:Cyanide" has a few minor errors in it, but it is STILL a great text establishing motive.

Despite what we were saying to the world, the US & UK were providing covert miltary assistance to Israel... The US, UK & Israel planned & started the Six-Day war and ACTUALLY committed the first act of war.
LIFE Magazine.. Volume 62.. June16, 1967..page 38D shows a PHOTOGRAPH of a bombed-out Egyptian Airfield which COULD ONLY have been shot from an RF-4 US reconnasaince plane(Israel had none of these).
Gun Camera photos would not have had that type of resolution.



Basically, this LIFE Magazine photo SHOWS THAT THERE has been absolutely NO NEED for terrorist/guerilla activity to regain the fresh-water springs of the Golan Heights nor the West Bank..
All it takes is a UN Security Council presentation of this photo and A DEMAND of the US & UK to THEMSELVES effect a return of the stolen lands..




In violation of their own laws(criminal conduct) established by Congress and Parliament approval of treaties.... they participated IN AN ACT OF WAR which resulted in the theft of land.
Now that they've been EXPOSED the photographic UN Demand can be made of the US & UK... not Israel.. to return the land...



Let's re-phrase this.. Israel would have NO SAY IN the matter of returning STOLEN LANDS... it would be an OBLIGATION of the US & UK to effect the return...

...as WELL AS punish those who murdered the Crew of the USS Liberty

[TOW]

Thanks for the read kal.